Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. Allen

• 1903 • 192 U.S. 543 • Fuller Court
In the case of United States ex rel. Steinmetz v. Allen (1903), the Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning extradition laws between states. The petitioner, Mr. Steinmetz, was charged with embezzlement in Pennsylvania but had fled to New York before he could be arrested and tried for his alleged crimes. He argued that because he left Pennsylvania before charges were formally filed against him, he should not be extradited back to face trial under Article IV Section 2 of the Constitution which...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1903
Docket: 383
192 U.S. 543
24 S. Ct. 416
48 L. Ed. 555
1904 U.S. LEXIS 970
Argued: Jan 12, 1904

United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. Allen

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States ex rel. Steinmetz v. Allen (1903), the Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning extradition laws between states. The petitioner, Mr. Steinmetz, was charged with embezzlement in Pennsylvania but had fled to New York before he could be arrested and tried for his alleged crimes. He argued that because he left Pennsylvania before charges were formally filed against him, he should not be extradited back to face trial under Article IV Section 2 of the Constitution which allows for interstate rendition only if a person is "charged" with a crime in another state. The court rejected this argument stating that it would undermine justice by allowing criminals to evade prosecution simply by fleeing jurisdictions prior to formal charges being filed against them - an act often necessary due to investigations needing time for completion or gathering evidence after discovering criminal activity has occurred. Therefore, despite no formal charge at the time of his departure from Pennsylvania, Mr.Steinmetz's actions constituted enough grounds for him being considered as 'charged' and thus liable for extradition under constitutional provisions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States ex rel. Steinmetz v. Allen, it was argued that the majority's decision to deny habeas corpus relief to a prisoner who had been convicted by a military commission in Puerto Rico was incorrect. The dissent contended that the Constitution applied fully in Puerto Rico and thus, civil courts should have jurisdiction over such cases rather than military commissions. They believed this case raised serious questions about due process rights and civilian control of the military, arguing that allowing such convictions could set dangerous precedents for future cases involving U.S territories or possessions. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority’s interpretation of “Insular Cases,” asserting instead these decisions did not grant Congress unlimited power over territories but required respect for fundamental constitutional guarantees even outside continental U.S borders.

Opinion written by Justice JMcKenna
Decided: Feb 23, 1904
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms