Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. State Of Oklahoma Et Al.

• 1918 • 250 U.S. 111 • White Court
In the case of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. State of Oklahoma et al., 1918, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state's right to tax foreign corporations operating within its borders. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland corporation doing business in Oklahoma, challenged an Oklahoma law that imposed higher taxes on out-of-state companies than those levied on domestic businesses. The company argued this was discriminatory and violated both due...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 304
250 U.S. 111
39 S. Ct. 399
63 L. Ed. 876
1919 U.S. LEXIS 1722
Argued: Apr 17, 1919

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. State Of Oklahoma Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. State of Oklahoma et al., 1918, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state's right to tax foreign corporations operating within its borders. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland corporation doing business in Oklahoma, challenged an Oklahoma law that imposed higher taxes on out-of-state companies than those levied on domestic businesses. The company argued this was discriminatory and violated both due process and equal protection clauses under the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the court upheld Oklahoma's taxation scheme as constitutional stating it did not infrarily discriminate against interstate commerce or violate any provision of federal constitution since states have broad power to determine their own fiscal policies including taxing structures for raising revenue.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. State of Oklahoma argued that the majority's decision to uphold an Oklahoma law requiring out-of-state insurance companies to deposit securities with the state before doing business there was unconstitutional. The dissenters believed this law violated both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, as it unfairly discriminated against non-resident corporations by imposing on them a burden not placed on resident corporations. They also contended that such laws could lead to retaliatory legislation from other states, creating a hostile environment for interstate commerce. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of previous court decisions regarding similar issues and felt those cases should have led to striking down this particular statute instead.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: May 19, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms