Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company

• 1918 • 249 U.S. 451 • White Court
The United States Supreme Court case of United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company in 1918 revolved around the interpretation and application of the Hepburn Act (1906), which prohibited railroads from transporting goods they owned across state lines. The U.S. government accused Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company of violating this law by shipping coal it had mined through its subsidiary company to customers outside New Mexico. However, the railway company argued that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 201
249 U.S. 451
39 S. Ct. 325
63 L. Ed. 703
1919 U.S. LEXIS 2102
Argued: Mar 11, 1919

United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States Supreme Court case of United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company in 1918 revolved around the interpretation and application of the Hepburn Act (1906), which prohibited railroads from transporting goods they owned across state lines. The U.S. government accused Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company of violating this law by shipping coal it had mined through its subsidiary company to customers outside New Mexico. However, the railway company argued that since it was not directly involved in mining operations but only transported coal as a common carrier for its subsidiary, it did not violate any laws. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railway company stating that while technically owning the coal due to its ownership stake in the mining subsidiary, such indirect ownership does not constitute a violation under Hepburn Act's prohibition against railroads transporting their own goods interstate because there is no direct competition with other shippers or carriers.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company argued that the majority decision was incorrect because it failed to properly interpret and apply the Hepburn Act. The dissenters believed that this act did not give the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) authority to set rates for private car lines owned by railroads, as these were separate businesses from public transportation services regulated under interstate commerce laws. They contended that allowing ICC regulation over such private entities would be an unjust expansion of federal power into areas traditionally governed by state law or left to free market forces. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of what constituted "unjust discrimination" under railroad rate regulations, arguing it should only refer to unfair practices between shippers rather than including potential disparities in profits among different types of business operations within a single company like a railway corporation.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Apr 14, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms