Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Minnie Atkins Et Al.

• 1922 • 260 U.S. 220 • Taft Court
In the case of United States v. Minnie Atkins et al., 1922, the Supreme Court dealt with issues related to mail fraud and conspiracy. The defendants, including Minnie Atkins, were charged with using the U.S. Postal Service for fraudulent purposes by sending out deceptive materials designed to defraud individuals of their money or property through a scheme known as "The Circle." This involved soliciting funds from victims under false pretenses that they would receive substantial returns on their...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1922
Docket: 45
260 U.S. 220
43 S. Ct. 78
67 L. Ed. 224
1922 U.S. LEXIS 2362
Argued: Oct 11, 1922

United States v. Minnie Atkins Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States v. Minnie Atkins et al., 1922, the Supreme Court dealt with issues related to mail fraud and conspiracy. The defendants, including Minnie Atkins, were charged with using the U.S. Postal Service for fraudulent purposes by sending out deceptive materials designed to defraud individuals of their money or property through a scheme known as "The Circle." This involved soliciting funds from victims under false pretenses that they would receive substantial returns on their investments when in fact no such returns existed. The court held that this constituted a violation of federal law prohibiting mail fraud and upheld the convictions against all defendants.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States v. Minnie Atkins et al., 1922, is not readily available from public sources. This could be due to a variety of reasons such as the age of the case, lack of digitization or simply because there was no recorded dissenting opinion for this particular Supreme Court decision. It's also possible that all justices concurred with the majority ruling and thus no dissent was written. Further research would be required using legal databases or archives to determine if a dissenting opinion exists for this specific court case.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Nov 20, 1922
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms