Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Board Of County Commissioners Of Osage County, Oklahoma, Et Al.

• 1919 • 251 U.S. 128 • White Court
The United States Supreme Court case, UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, et al., 1919 revolved around the issue of taxation on lands allotted to members of the Osage Indian Tribe in Oklahoma. The U.S government sued the Board of County Commissioners of Osage County for imposing taxes on these lands which were held under trust by the federal government for benefit of tribe members. The court ruled that while generally states have no jurisdiction over tribal...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1919
Docket: 309
251 U.S. 128
40 S. Ct. 100
64 L. Ed. 184
1919 U.S. LEXIS 1828
Argued: Apr 16, 1919

United States v. Board Of County Commissioners Of Osage County, Oklahoma, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States Supreme Court case, UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, et al., 1919 revolved around the issue of taxation on lands allotted to members of the Osage Indian Tribe in Oklahoma. The U.S government sued the Board of County Commissioners of Osage County for imposing taxes on these lands which were held under trust by the federal government for benefit of tribe members. The court ruled that while generally states have no jurisdiction over tribal lands or property held in trust by federal government for Native Americans, this particular situation was different because Congress had passed a law specifically allowing allotment holders to lease their land and receive income from it - effectively treating them as private property owners rather than beneficiaries under a trust arrangement. Therefore, according to this ruling, such properties could be subjected to state and local taxation without violating any constitutional protections afforded to Native American tribes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States v. Board of County Commissioners of Osage County, Oklahoma argued that the majority's decision to allow federal taxation on oil and gas leases from Native American lands was incorrect. The dissenters believed that this ruling violated previous treaties between the U.S government and Native American tribes which exempted tribal lands from taxation. They contended that these treaties should be honored as they were made in good faith at a time when tribes had little power or representation within the government system. Furthermore, they expressed concern over potential negative impacts on tribal economies due to increased financial burdens imposed by such taxes, arguing it could lead to further economic marginalization for already disadvantaged groups.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Dec 15, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms