Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. California And California State Board Of Equalization

• 1992 • 507 U.S. 746 • Rehnquist Court
The case of United States v. California and California State Board of Equalization in 1992 revolved around the issue of whether or not a state could impose sales tax on purchases made by federal employees at military base exchanges, which are essentially retail stores located within military bases. The U.S. government argued that such taxation was unconstitutional as it violated principles of intergovernmental tax immunity, asserting that these taxes indirectly burdened the federal government...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1992
Docket: 91-2003
507 U.S. 746
113 S. Ct. 1784
123 L. Ed. 2d 528
1993 U.S. LEXIS 3003
Argued: Feb 23, 1993

United States v. California And California State Board Of Equalization

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The case of United States v. California and California State Board of Equalization in 1992 revolved around the issue of whether or not a state could impose sales tax on purchases made by federal employees at military base exchanges, which are essentially retail stores located within military bases. The U.S. government argued that such taxation was unconstitutional as it violated principles of intergovernmental tax immunity, asserting that these taxes indirectly burdened the federal government because they increased operating costs for these exchanges and reduced their profitability. On the other hand, California contended that this was a permissible form of taxation since it did not discriminate against the Federal Government or those with whom it deals. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of California stating that there is no constitutional prohibition against nondiscriminatory state taxation resulting in an indirect economic effect on the United States; hence states can levy sales taxes on purchases made by federal employees at military base exchanges without violating any constitutional provisions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States v. California and California State Board of Equalization, Justice Blackmun argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established precedent regarding state taxation of federal contractors. He contended that the Court had previously held that states could tax government contractors as long as they did not discriminate against them or burden the Federal Government with more than its fair share of taxes. In this case, he believed there was no evidence to suggest either discrimination or undue burden on part of California’s taxation scheme. The justice also pointed out inconsistencies in how different types of federal contracts were treated under this ruling, which he felt undermined its logic and fairness. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on cooperative federalism by limiting states' ability to raise revenue through taxing such contracts.

Opinion written by Justice SDOConnor
Decided: Apr 26, 1993
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms