Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. The Commissioner

1866 • 72 U.S. 563 • Chase Court
In United States v. The Commissioner, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a tax imposed by Congress on certain incomes was constitutional. The court held that it was not, finding that the power of taxation did not extend to such income and thus could not be used as a means of raising revenue for the government. Furthermore, they found that if Congress were allowed to impose taxes on this type of income then it would amount to an unconstitutional taking without due process or...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1866
72 U.S. 563
18 L. Ed. 692
1866 U.S. LEXIS 961
Argued: May 02, 1867

United States v. The Commissioner

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. The Commissioner, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a tax imposed by Congress on certain incomes was constitutional. The court held that it was not, finding that the power of taxation did not extend to such income and thus could not be used as a means of raising revenue for the government. Furthermore, they found that if Congress were allowed to impose taxes on this type of income then it would amount to an unconstitutional taking without due process or compensation from those affected by it. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of The Commissioner and declared the tax unconstitutional.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. The Commissioner, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a tax imposed on income from certain bonds issued by the state of Tennessee was constitutional. Justice Field delivered a dissenting opinion in which he argued that Congress did not have the power to impose such taxes under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. He reasoned that this section only gave Congress authority to lay and collect taxes for specific purposes related to its enumerated powers; it did not give them general taxing power over all sources of income or property within their jurisdiction. Furthermore, he noted that if Congress had been given such broad authority then they could potentially interfere with states’ rights and sovereignty by imposing taxes on any source of revenue within their borders without limitation or restriction. As such, Justice Field concluded that this particular tax was unconstitutional as it exceeded Congressional authority granted under Article I, Section 8 and violated states’ rights protected by other provisions in the Constitution.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms