Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Darby

• 1932 • 289 U.S. 224 • Hughes Court
The United States v. Darby case in 1932 was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court that upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established minimum wage, overtime pay and child labor standards for employees engaged in interstate commerce. The defendant, Fred M. Darby Lumber Company, argued that Congress lacked the constitutional authority to regulate intrastate activities such as local manufacturing processes and labor conditions. However, the court unanimously ruled against this...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1932
Docket: 653
289 U.S. 224
53 S. Ct. 573
77 L. Ed. 1137
1933 U.S. LEXIS 964
Argued: Mar 14, 1933

United States v. Darby

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States v. Darby case in 1932 was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court that upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established minimum wage, overtime pay and child labor standards for employees engaged in interstate commerce. The defendant, Fred M. Darby Lumber Company, argued that Congress lacked the constitutional authority to regulate intrastate activities such as local manufacturing processes and labor conditions. However, the court unanimously ruled against this argument stating that under its Commerce Clause powers (Article I Section 8), Congress had broad authority to regulate any activity having substantial economic effect on interstate commerce even if it is purely local in nature. This ruling effectively expanded federal power over states' rights issues related to business regulation and marked a significant shift towards greater federal intervention in economic affairs.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The United States v. Darby case in 1932 did not have a dissenting opinion, as the decision was unanimous. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress had the power under the Commerce Clause to regulate employment conditions, specifically supporting the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 which established minimum wage and maximum hours standards for workers in interstate commerce industries. This ruling overturned previous decisions limiting congressional control over intrastate commerce and labor regulations, marking a significant expansion of federal authority over economic activity.

Opinion written by Justice BNCardozo
Decided: Apr 10, 1933
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms