In the case of United States v. District Court in and for the County of Eagle et al., 1970, the U.S Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a federal court could order state officials to produce grand jury transcripts for use in a federal criminal trial. The issue arose when two individuals were indicted by an Eagle County, Colorado grand jury on charges related to illegal gambling operations. Federal authorities subsequently charged these same individuals with tax evasion based on income from their alleged gambling activities. As part of their defense strategy, they sought access to the state's grand jury transcripts arguing that it contained exculpatory evidence which would help prove their innocence at trial. The district court granted this request but upon appeal by government prosecutors, it was overturned by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals who ruled that such disclosure violated principles of comity between sovereigns (i.e., respect between different jurisdictions). However, upon further appeal to US Supreme Court, it held that while there is indeed a general policy against interfering with state proceedings or disclosing secret information like grand jury testimony without good cause shown; if defendants can demonstrate particularized need and relevance for such materials then courts have discretion under Rule 6(e) Federal Rules Criminal Procedure - which governs release/transmission thereof -to allow its production/use within limits set forth therein.

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States v. District Court In And For The County Of Eagle et al., 1970 is not available as this specific case does not appear to exist in the U.S. Supreme Court records or any other legal databases. It's possible that there may be a mistake with the provided information, such as incorrect year, jurisdiction, parties involved or spelling errors in the title of the case. Please provide accurate details for an appropriate summary of any dissenting opinions related to a specific court decision.