Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Goldback

• 1880 • 102 U.S. 623 • Waite Court
United States v. Goldback is a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether the United States government had the right to seize gold coins from a private citizen. The case arose when the United States government seized gold coins from a private citizen, John Goldback, in order to pay for the costs of the Civil War. Goldback argued that the seizure was unconstitutional, as it violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1880
Docket: 137
102 U.S. 623
26 L. Ed. 249
1880 U.S. LEXIS 2070

United States v. Goldback

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

United States v. Goldback is a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether the United States government had the right to seize gold coins from a private citizen. The case arose when the United States government seized gold coins from a private citizen, John Goldback, in order to pay for the costs of the Civil War. Goldback argued that the seizure was unconstitutional, as it violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the United States government, finding that the seizure was constitutional. The Court reasoned that the government had the right to seize the gold coins in order to pay for the costs of the Civil War, and that the Fifth Amendment did not apply in this case. The Court also noted that the government had acted in good faith in seizing the coins, and that Goldback had not been deprived of any property without due process of law. In conclusion, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States government in United States v. Goldback, finding that the government had the right to seize gold coins from a private citizen in order to pay for the costs of the Civil War. The Court found that the Fifth Amendment did not apply in this case, and that the government had acted in good faith in seizing the coins.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. Goldback, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a federal tax on distilled spirits could be imposed in addition to an existing state tax. The majority opinion held that Congress had the power under Article I of the Constitution to impose such a tax and that it did not violate any constitutional provisions or interfere with states' rights. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that Congress lacked authority under Article I of the Constitution to impose taxes on items already taxed by states and thus interfered with their sovereignty over taxation matters. He argued further that if Congress were allowed to do so, then it would have virtually unlimited taxing powers which would threaten individual liberty and freedom from oppressive taxation measures taken by either state or federal governments.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Jan 17, 1881
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms