Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.

• 1958 • 359 U.S. 314 • Warren Court
In the United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co., 1958, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government, allowing it to recover damages from a private shipping company for injuries sustained by an enlisted man while performing his duties aboard one of their vessels during World War II. The case arose when a seaman was injured due to negligence on part of Isthmian Steamship Company's employees and sued them for compensation. However, since he had already received medical care and disability...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1958
Docket: 285
359 U.S. 314
79 S. Ct. 857
3 L. Ed. 2d 845
1959 U.S. LEXIS 1752
Argued: Feb 25, 1959

United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co., 1958, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government, allowing it to recover damages from a private shipping company for injuries sustained by an enlisted man while performing his duties aboard one of their vessels during World War II. The case arose when a seaman was injured due to negligence on part of Isthmian Steamship Company's employees and sued them for compensation. However, since he had already received medical care and disability benefits from the Navy (which is funded by taxpayers), there was a question whether these costs could be recovered from Isthmian or if they were solely governmental responsibility. The court held that under common law principles, any party who incurs expenses as result of another's tortious conduct can seek reimbursement - this includes the government too.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co., Justice Brennan, joined by Chief Justice Warren and Justices Black and Douglas, disagreed with the majority's interpretation of Section 5(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). They argued that this section should not be read to bar a suit against a government contractor when an employee is injured due to negligence in maintaining equipment. The dissenters believed that such an interpretation was contrary to Congress' intent when it enacted FTCA - which was designed to provide compensation for those injured as a result of governmental negligence. They also pointed out that under this ruling, employees who are hurt on ships owned by private companies can sue their employers while those working on government-owned vessels cannot – creating an unfair double standard.

Opinion written by Justice EWarren
Decided: Apr 27, 1959
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms