Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Jones

• 1886 • 119 U.S. 477 • Waite Court
United States v. Jones was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether the government had the right to search a person's property without a warrant. The case involved a man named Jones who was accused of counterfeiting. The government searched his property without a warrant and found evidence of counterfeiting. Jones argued that the search was unconstitutional and that the government had violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jones,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
119 U.S. 477
7 S. Ct. 283
30 L. Ed. 440
1886 U.S. LEXIS 2015

United States v. Jones

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

United States v. Jones was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether the government had the right to search a person's property without a warrant. The case involved a man named Jones who was accused of counterfeiting. The government searched his property without a warrant and found evidence of counterfeiting. Jones argued that the search was unconstitutional and that the government had violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jones, holding that the search was unconstitutional and that the government had violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Court held that the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures and that the government must obtain a warrant before searching a person's property. The Court also held that the government must show probable cause before obtaining a warrant. This case established the precedent that the government must obtain a warrant before searching a person's property.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. Jones, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a search warrant issued for property owned by the defendant was valid. The majority opinion held that it was not valid because it did not meet the Fourth Amendment's requirement of particularity in describing what could be searched and seized. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that since there were no specific items listed in the warrant, any evidence found on or near the premises should still be admissible as long as it is relevant to proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He argued further that if an officer had probable cause to believe certain items were present at a location then they should have been able to seize them without having those items specifically named in advance. In conclusion, Justice Field believed that while warrants must contain some degree of specificity regarding what can be searched and seized, they do not need to list every item beforehand so long as officers have sufficient reason for believing those items are present at a given location.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Dec 13, 1886
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms