Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Montgomery County Board Of Education Et Al.

• 1968 • 395 U.S. 225 • Warren Court
In the United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al., 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against a "freedom-of-choice" plan implemented by Alabama's Montgomery County School District that allowed parents to choose which school their child would attend, regardless of race. The court found this policy perpetuated racial segregation rather than eliminating it as mandated by previous rulings such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Despite being open in theory to all races,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1968
Docket: 798
395 U.S. 225
89 S. Ct. 1670
23 L. Ed. 2d 263
1969 U.S. LEXIS 1433
Argued: Apr 28, 1969

United States v. Montgomery County Board Of Education Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al., 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against a "freedom-of-choice" plan implemented by Alabama's Montgomery County School District that allowed parents to choose which school their child would attend, regardless of race. The court found this policy perpetuated racial segregation rather than eliminating it as mandated by previous rulings such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Despite being open in theory to all races, practical factors resulted in most white students attending predominantly white schools and black students attending predominantly black schools under this system. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that freedom-of-choice plans were not sufficient to meet desegregation requirements if they did not result in actual integration.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of UNITED STATES v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., 1968, argued that the court's decision to uphold a lower court ruling requiring immediate desegregation of public schools was an overreach of judicial power. The dissenters believed that such decisions should be left to local authorities and communities who are more familiar with their unique circumstances and needs. They also expressed concern about potential negative impacts on students due to sudden changes in school environments and routines, suggesting instead for gradual integration as a more practical approach towards achieving racial equality in education. Furthermore, they questioned whether federal courts had jurisdiction over state matters like public schooling under the Constitution.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Jun 02, 1969
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms