Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Thomas R. Noland, Trustee For Debtor First Truck Lines, Inc.

• 1995 • 517 U.S. 535 • Rehnquist Court
The Supreme Court case United States v. Thomas R. Noland, Trustee for Debtor First Truck Lines, Inc., 1995 revolved around the issue of whether post-petition interest on an unsecured tax claim by a federal agency is allowable in bankruptcy proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor was First Truck Lines and its trustee was Thomas R. Noland who argued against allowing such interest to be claimed by the IRS (Internal Revenue Service). However, the court ruled in favor of the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1995
Docket: 95-323
517 U.S. 535
116 S. Ct. 1524
134 L. Ed. 2d 748
1996 U.S. LEXIS 2957
Argued: Mar 25, 1996

United States v. Thomas R. Noland, Trustee For Debtor First Truck Lines, Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Supreme Court case United States v. Thomas R. Noland, Trustee for Debtor First Truck Lines, Inc., 1995 revolved around the issue of whether post-petition interest on an unsecured tax claim by a federal agency is allowable in bankruptcy proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor was First Truck Lines and its trustee was Thomas R. Noland who argued against allowing such interest to be claimed by the IRS (Internal Revenue Service). However, the court ruled in favor of the United States government stating that while unsecured creditors generally do not receive post-petition interest under Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, this does not apply to governmental units like IRS due to their special status as sovereign entities which are exempted from general rules applicable to private creditors.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the United States v. Thomas R. Noland case argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with both the language and purpose of Bankruptcy Code § 507(a)(7). The dissent believed that Congress intended to give priority status only to those tax penalties related to pecuniary loss, not punitive ones like those at issue in this case. They contended that by giving priority status to such penalties, it would unfairly disadvantage other creditors who are also seeking repayment from a debtor’s limited assets during bankruptcy proceedings. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "compensation for actual pecuniary loss," arguing instead that it should be read more narrowly so as not include punitive damages or fines designed primarily for deterrence or retribution rather than compensation.

Opinion written by Justice DHSouter
Decided: May 13, 1996
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms