Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The United States, Plaintiffs In Error, v. One Package Of Merchandise. Lion, Pinsard, And Co., Claimants

1854 • 58 U.S. 98 • Taney Court
In the United States Supreme Court case of The United States v. One Package of Merchandise, Lion, Pinsard & Co., Claimants, the court was asked to decide whether a package containing merchandise imported from France had been legally seized by customs officers in New York City. The claimants argued that they were not liable for duties on the goods because they had already paid them in France and thus did not owe any additional taxes upon importation into the US. However, after examining evidence...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1854
58 U.S. 98
15 L. Ed. 58
1854 U.S. LEXIS 498

The United States, Plaintiffs In Error, v. One Package Of Merchandise. Lion, Pinsard, And Co., Claimants

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States Supreme Court case of The United States v. One Package of Merchandise, Lion, Pinsard & Co., Claimants, the court was asked to decide whether a package containing merchandise imported from France had been legally seized by customs officers in New York City. The claimants argued that they were not liable for duties on the goods because they had already paid them in France and thus did not owe any additional taxes upon importation into the US. However, after examining evidence presented by both sides and considering relevant laws regarding international trade at that time, it was determined that no duty had been paid on this particular shipment when it arrived in New York City and therefore customs officials acted lawfully when seizing it. Ultimately, the court ruled against Lion et al., finding them liable for all applicable duties due on their imported goods as required under US law at that time.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of The United States v. One Package of Merchandise, Lion, Pinsard and Co., Claimants, the dissenting opinion was that Congress had not intended to give a right to sue for duties on imported merchandise in this particular situation. The majority opinion held that under the Tariff Act of 1846, which imposed duties on certain goods imported into the United States from foreign countries or places subject to their jurisdiction, an action could be brought against any person who attempted to defraud or evade payment of such duty by importing merchandise without paying it. However, Justice Grier argued that this interpretation was too broad and would lead to absurd results if applied in all cases where fraud was alleged; he believed there must have been some other intent behind Congress’s decision when they passed the act. He further stated that while it may be true that fraudulent importation should be punished with forfeiture as provided by law but he did not believe it followed necessarily from this principle alone that every package containing dutiable articles should also suffer forfeiture regardless of whether fraud had occurred or not.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms