Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Peltier

• 1974 • 422 U.S. 531 • Burger Court
In the case of United States v. Peltier, 1974, the U.S Supreme Court dealt with an issue related to evidence obtained illegally by law enforcement officers. The defendant, Francis Peltier was stopped and searched by police while driving a car that had been reported stolen. During this search, weapons were found in his vehicle which led to charges against him for illegal possession of firearms. He argued that since the initial stop was based on faulty information (the car hadn't actually been...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1974
Docket: 73-2000
422 U.S. 531
95 S. Ct. 2313
45 L. Ed. 2d 374
1975 U.S. LEXIS 155
Argued: Feb 18, 1975

United States v. Peltier

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States v. Peltier, 1974, the U.S Supreme Court dealt with an issue related to evidence obtained illegally by law enforcement officers. The defendant, Francis Peltier was stopped and searched by police while driving a car that had been reported stolen. During this search, weapons were found in his vehicle which led to charges against him for illegal possession of firearms. He argued that since the initial stop was based on faulty information (the car hadn't actually been stolen), all subsequent evidence should be excluded under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine - a legal principle stating that any evidence collected or analyzed in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights is considered tainted and must be excluded from trial. The court ruled against Peltier arguing that even if there had been an error made during his arrest process it would not have affected whether or not he possessed those guns at time they were discovered; therefore such exclusionary rule did not apply here because its purpose is to deter unlawful police conduct rather than rectify errors made after-the-fact.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States v. Peltier, Justice Brennan argued that the majority's decision to allow evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights was fundamentally flawed. He contended that this ruling undermined the exclusionary rule which is designed to deter unlawful police conduct by excluding illegally obtained evidence from trial. The majority had justified their decision on grounds that law enforcement officers acted in good faith reliance on existing precedent at the time of search and seizure, but Brennan countered this argument stating it would be impossible to determine whether an officer truly relied upon such precedents when violating a person’s constitutional rights. Furthermore, he emphasized that allowing such exceptions could lead to erosion of Fourth Amendment protections over time as more exceptions are made based on changing legal interpretations or shifting societal norms.

Opinion written by Justice WHRehnquist
Decided: Jun 25, 1975
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms