Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Pewee Coal Co., Inc.

• 1950 • 341 U.S. 114 • Vinson Court
The United States v. Pewee Coal Co., Inc. case in 1950 revolved around the issue of whether or not the U.S government was liable for a loss incurred by a coal company during its operation under federal control. During World War II, President Truman issued an executive order directing Secretary of Interior to take possession and operate most of nation's bituminous coal mines to prevent labor strikes from disrupting war production efforts. The Pewee Coal Company claimed that it suffered losses...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1950
Docket: 168
341 U.S. 114
71 S. Ct. 670
95 L. Ed. 2d 809
1951 U.S. LEXIS 2445
Argued: Jan 02, 1951

United States v. Pewee Coal Co., Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States v. Pewee Coal Co., Inc. case in 1950 revolved around the issue of whether or not the U.S government was liable for a loss incurred by a coal company during its operation under federal control. During World War II, President Truman issued an executive order directing Secretary of Interior to take possession and operate most of nation's bituminous coal mines to prevent labor strikes from disrupting war production efforts. The Pewee Coal Company claimed that it suffered losses due to this action and sought compensation from the government under Fifth Amendment "takings" clause which prohibits private property being taken for public use without just compensation. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Pewee Coal Co., stating that although the seizure was temporary, it still constituted as a 'taking' within meaning of Fifth Amendment because it involved physical invasion and occupation by Government agents who displaced owner's management team temporarily but completely, thus making U.S government liable for any losses incurred during period when mines were operated by Federal Mine Operating Agency.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States v. Pewee Coal Co., Inc., Justice Robert H. Jackson argued that the government should not be held liable for damages resulting from its operation of a private business during wartime, as it was acting in its sovereign capacity to protect national interests and ensure continued coal production amidst labor disputes. He contended that such actions were taken under war powers granted by the Constitution, which do not include liability for losses incurred while operating businesses seized to prevent work stoppages threatening war production. The majority's decision, he believed, could deter future governmental intervention in times of crisis due to fear of financial repercussions. Furthermore, he disagreed with their interpretation of "just compensation," arguing it applies when property is taken permanently or temporarily for public use but does not cover operational losses suffered by government-run businesses during emergencies.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Apr 30, 1951
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms