Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Reese Et Al.

• 1875 • 92 U.S. 214 • Waite Court
United States v. Reese et al. was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the constitutionality of a federal statute that imposed a tax on the privilege of voting in federal elections. The case was brought by the United States against Reese and other individuals who had refused to pay the tax. The Supreme Court held that the statute was constitutional, as it did not violate the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibited the denial of the right to vote based on race, color, or previous...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1875
Docket: 634
92 U.S. 214
23 L. Ed. 563
1875 U.S. LEXIS 1751
Argued: Jan 13, 1875

United States v. Reese Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

United States v. Reese et al. was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the constitutionality of a federal statute that imposed a tax on the privilege of voting in federal elections. The case was brought by the United States against Reese and other individuals who had refused to pay the tax. The Supreme Court held that the statute was constitutional, as it did not violate the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibited the denial of the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The Court also held that the statute did not violate the First Amendment, as it did not impose a penalty on the exercise of the right to vote. The Court reasoned that the statute was a valid exercise of Congress' power to tax and regulate the manner of voting in federal elections. The Court also held that the statute did not violate the Equal Protection Clause, as it did not discriminate against any particular class of voters. The Court concluded that the statute was a valid exercise of Congress' power to regulate the manner of voting in federal elections.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. Reese et al., the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a law passed by Congress that prohibited certain activities related to voting in federal elections violated the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which prohibits states from denying citizens their right to vote based on race or color. The majority opinion held that Congress had exceeded its authority under the Fifteenth Amendment and struck down the law as unconstitutional. Justice Field dissented, arguing that while it is true that only states can deny citizens their right to vote based on race or color, this does not mean they are precluded from passing laws regulating how people may exercise their rights at election time. He argued further that since Congress has broad powers over federal elections, it should be allowed some leeway in deciding what regulations are necessary for those elections and should not be limited solely by state action when determining such matters.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Mar 27, 1876
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms