Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Thomas, Registrar Of Voters Of Washington Parish, Louisiana, Et Al.

• 1959 • 362 U.S. 58 • Warren Court
The United States Supreme Court case, UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF WASHINGTON PARISH, LOUISIANA et al., 1959 dealt with the issue of racial discrimination in voter registration processes. The federal government sued William Thomas and other officials from Washington Parish in Louisiana for allegedly denying black citizens their right to vote based on race or color. The defendants argued that they were immune from such a lawsuit because they were acting as state officers when...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1959
Docket: 667
362 U.S. 58
80 S. Ct. 612
4 L. Ed. 2d 535
1960 U.S. LEXIS 1565
Argued: Feb 23, 1960

United States v. Thomas, Registrar Of Voters Of Washington Parish, Louisiana, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States Supreme Court case, UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF WASHINGTON PARISH, LOUISIANA et al., 1959 dealt with the issue of racial discrimination in voter registration processes. The federal government sued William Thomas and other officials from Washington Parish in Louisiana for allegedly denying black citizens their right to vote based on race or color. The defendants argued that they were immune from such a lawsuit because they were acting as state officers when carrying out their duties related to voter registration. However, the Supreme Court ruled against them stating that no person has immunity if he is violating constitutional rights while performing his official functions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States v. Thomas, Registrar of Voters of Washington Parish, Louisiana et al., Justice Frankfurter argued that the majority's decision to allow federal courts to intervene in state election processes was an overreach of judicial power. He contended that such intervention should only occur when there is clear and undeniable proof of a violation of constitutional rights. In this case, he believed that no such evidence existed and thus disagreed with the majority's ruling which allowed federal oversight on voter registration procedures in Washington Parish, Louisiana. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative consequences from this decision including undermining states' rights and creating unnecessary tension between state and federal governments.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Feb 29, 1960
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms