Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

• 1960 • 365 U.S. 624 • Warren Court
In the case of United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 1960, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government, affirming that a public utility company was subject to federal anti-trust laws. The court held that Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO), which had been granted monopoly status by state law, could still be prosecuted under federal antitrust legislation for attempting to monopolize power supply in areas outside its designated service area. VEPCO argued it was immune...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1960
Docket: 49
365 U.S. 624
81 S. Ct. 784
5 L. Ed. 2d 838
1961 U.S. LEXIS 1958
Argued: Nov 10, 1960

United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 1960, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government, affirming that a public utility company was subject to federal anti-trust laws. The court held that Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO), which had been granted monopoly status by state law, could still be prosecuted under federal antitrust legislation for attempting to monopolize power supply in areas outside its designated service area. VEPCO argued it was immune from such prosecution due to its state-sanctioned monopoly status within certain regions; however, this argument was rejected by the court on grounds that immunity did not extend beyond those specific regions. This decision reinforced the supremacy of federal law over state law when it comes to regulating interstate commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a Federal Power Commission order requiring Virginia Electric & Power Company (VEPCO) to sell power at wholesale rates set by federal authorities, rather than state-set retail rates, overstepped its jurisdiction. The dissent contended that VEPCO was not engaged in interstate commerce as their electricity sales were confined within Virginia and thus should be subject only to state regulation. They further asserted that even if some of this energy originated from out-of-state sources, this did not automatically convert all of VEPCO's operations into an interstate business. Therefore, they believed the Federal Power Act did not apply here and criticized the majority for expanding federal authority beyond constitutional limits while undermining states' rights.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Apr 03, 1961
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms