Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.

• 1941 • 315 U.S. 110 • Stone Court
The United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co., 1941, was a case that revolved around the constitutionality of federal price controls on intrastate milk sales. The Wrightwood Dairy Company argued that these regulations were unconstitutional as they exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause because they regulated activities within individual states rather than interstate commerce. However, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the U.S government stating that even if an activity is...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1941
Docket: 744
315 U.S. 110
62 S. Ct. 523
86 L. Ed. 726
1942 U.S. LEXIS 1164
Argued: Jan 14, 1942

United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co., 1941, was a case that revolved around the constitutionality of federal price controls on intrastate milk sales. The Wrightwood Dairy Company argued that these regulations were unconstitutional as they exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause because they regulated activities within individual states rather than interstate commerce. However, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the U.S government stating that even if an activity is purely intrastate, it can still have such a substantial effect on interstate commerce to be within federal regulatory power. The court held that Congress had rightfully exercised its authority under the Commerce Clause when it enacted legislation regulating prices for milk sold by producers and handlers operating entirely within one state since this could directly affect interstate commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co., there was no recorded dissenting opinion. The Supreme Court's decision in this case was unanimous, with all justices agreeing that Congress had the power to regulate intrastate transactions if they have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. This ruling upheld the constitutionality of federal price controls on milk set by the Secretary of Agriculture under authority granted by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, even though most milk sales were local and did not cross state lines.

Opinion written by Justice HFStone
Decided: Feb 02, 1942
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms