Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Verizon Md. Inc. v. Public Service Comm'n Of Md.

• 2001 • 535 U.S. 635 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland, 2001, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Verizon. The issue at hand was whether a federal district court had jurisdiction to determine if state utility commissions were enforcing federal law correctly under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The act aimed to promote competition among local telephone service providers and required incumbent carriers like Verizon to share their networks with new entrants at...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 2001
Docket: 00-1531
535 U.S. 635
122 S. Ct. 1753
152 L. Ed. 2d 871
2002 U.S. LEXIS 3787
Argued: Dec 05, 2001

Verizon Md. Inc. v. Public Service Comm'n Of Md.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland, 2001, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Verizon. The issue at hand was whether a federal district court had jurisdiction to determine if state utility commissions were enforcing federal law correctly under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The act aimed to promote competition among local telephone service providers and required incumbent carriers like Verizon to share their networks with new entrants at reasonable rates set by state commissions but guided by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations. The Public Service Commission ordered Verizon to pay damages for breaching interconnection agreements with other companies, which led them filing suit against it in a federal district court claiming that this order violated FCC rules and thus preempted by federal law. The Supreme Court held that such cases could be heard in a federal court because they arise from laws regulating commerce or protecting civil rights - both areas where Congress has given those courts jurisdiction.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland disagreed with the majority's interpretation of federal law and its application to state commissions. The dissent argued that under Section 252(e)(6) of the Telecommunications Act, a party may only bring an action in federal court if it is challenging whether an agreement meets requirements set by Sections 251 and 252, not for any other type of dispute arising from such agreements. They contended that this particular disagreement between Verizon and the Public Service Commission was not about whether their agreement met these requirements but rather how to interpret one provision within their already approved contract - something they believe falls outside federal jurisdiction as per Section 252(e)(6). Therefore, according to them, this matter should have been left for resolution through state mechanisms or arbitration processes outlined in existing contracts instead.

Opinion written by Justice AScalia
Decided: May 20, 2002
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms