Virginia, et al. v. United States

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case addressed the Virginia Military Institute's (VMI) male-only admissions policy, which was challenged as unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The United States argued that VMI's exclusion of women denied them equal protection under the law. In response, Virginia proposed a parallel program for women at Mary Baldwin College called the Virginia Women's Institute for Leadership (VWIL). However, this alternative was deemed insufficient by lower courts because it did not offer comparable educational opportunities or prestige. Ultimately, in a landmark decision authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Supreme Court ruled against VMI and held that its male-only admissions policy violated constitutional principles of gender equality. The ruling emphasized that any gender-based governmental action must demonstrate an exceedingly persuasive justification to withstand scrutiny.

Opinion written by Justice Ginsburg

Decided 26 Jun 1996 · Official report

usrep518515.pdfOpen in a new tab