Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young Et Al.

• 1932 • 287 U.S. 488 • Hughes Court
In the case of Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young et al., 1932, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Wabash Valley Electric Company against a group of its employees represented by Young and others. The dispute arose when the company decided to reduce wages due to economic hardship during the Great Depression without consulting with its employees or their union representatives first, which was considered a breach of contract under Indiana state law at that time. However, the court held that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1932
Docket: 128
287 U.S. 488
53 S. Ct. 234
77 L. Ed. 447
1933 U.S. LEXIS 4
Argued: Dec 07, 1932

Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young et al., 1932, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Wabash Valley Electric Company against a group of its employees represented by Young and others. The dispute arose when the company decided to reduce wages due to economic hardship during the Great Depression without consulting with its employees or their union representatives first, which was considered a breach of contract under Indiana state law at that time. However, the court held that federal law superseded state laws in this matter as per Article VI Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause) of US Constitution and therefore, it was not necessary for employers to negotiate wage reductions with unions during times of financial distress according to Norris-LaGuardia Act passed earlier in 1932 which limited power courts had over labor disputes including issuing injunctions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. Young et al., argued that the majority's decision to uphold an Indiana law requiring public utilities to obtain approval from a state commission before reducing wages was incorrect. The dissenting justices believed this law violated the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees due process and equal protection under the law, as it interfered with private contractual relationships between employers and employees without sufficient justification or benefit to public welfare. They contended that while states have broad powers to regulate businesses serving public interests, these powers should not extend into areas such as wage determination unless there is clear evidence of exploitation or unfair practices necessitating government intervention. In their view, this particular regulation overstepped its bounds by infringing upon individual liberty rights protected by constitutional principles.

Opinion written by Justice GSutherland
Decided: Jan 09, 1933
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms