Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wardell v. Railroad Company

• 1880 • 103 U.S. 651 • Waite Court
In Wardell v. Railroad Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a train accident. The plaintiff, Wardell, was a passenger on the train when it collided with another train. Wardell was injured in the accident and sued the railroad company for damages. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the accident. The Court reasoned that the railroad company had a duty to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1880
Docket: 167
103 U.S. 651
26 L. Ed. 509
1880 U.S. LEXIS 2168
Argued: Dec 21, 1880

Wardell v. Railroad Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Wardell v. Railroad Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a train accident. The plaintiff, Wardell, was a passenger on the train when it collided with another train. Wardell was injured in the accident and sued the railroad company for damages. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the accident. The Court reasoned that the railroad company had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of its trains, and that it had breached this duty by failing to take proper precautions to prevent the accident. The Court also held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the accident, even though the accident was caused by the negligence of the other train's engineer. The Court's decision established that railroad companies are liable for damages caused by their negligence, even if the negligence of another party contributed to the accident. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and has become an important precedent in the area of railroad liability.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Wardell v. Railroad Company, arguing that the majority's decision was wrongfully based on a misinterpretation of the law and facts. He argued that under Missouri state law, which governed this case, an agreement between two parties to arbitrate any disputes arising from their contract must be made before or at least contemporaneously with the formation of said contract. In this case, however, there was no such agreement; instead it had been entered into after litigation had already begun over a dispute related to the original contract. Therefore Justice Field concluded that since there was no valid arbitration agreement in place when suit was filed by Wardell against Railroad Company for breach of contract then he should have been allowed his day in court rather than being denied due process as pertained by statute and precedent set forth by prior cases decided upon by both federal and state courts alike.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Apr 11, 1881
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms