Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wayne County Board Of Review Et Al. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.

• 1936 • 300 U.S. 29 • Hughes Court
In the case of Wayne County Board of Review et al. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp., 1936, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Great Lakes Steel Corporation. The company had challenged a tax assessment by Wayne County Board on its property located within Ecorse Township, Michigan. The court held that the county board violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment when it increased an assessment without giving notice to or hearing from Great Lakes Steel Corp before making such changes....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1936
Docket: 253
300 U.S. 29
57 S. Ct. 329
81 L. Ed. 485
1937 U.S. LEXIS 60
Argued: Jan 12, 1937

Wayne County Board Of Review Et Al. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Wayne County Board of Review et al. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp., 1936, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Great Lakes Steel Corporation. The company had challenged a tax assessment by Wayne County Board on its property located within Ecorse Township, Michigan. The court held that the county board violated due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment when it increased an assessment without giving notice to or hearing from Great Lakes Steel Corp before making such changes. This decision reinforced that taxpayers have a constitutional right to be heard at some point during taxation proceedings and any violation would render assessments void.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Wayne County Board of Review et al. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp., it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a tax assessment on property owned by Great Lakes Steel Corporation in Michigan violated principles of equal protection under law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The dissenting justices contended that there was clear evidence showing an intentional and systematic undervaluation of other similar properties within Wayne County, which resulted in an unequal and discriminatory taxation against Great Lakes Steel Corp. They believed this constituted a violation of constitutional rights and should have been rectified by ordering reassessment or refunding excess taxes paid rather than upholding the unfair tax burden placed upon one company while others were given preferential treatment.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Feb 01, 1937
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms