Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wells & Others v. Wilkins

• 1885 • 116 U.S. 393 • Waite Court
Wells & Others v. Wilkins is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1886. The case involved a dispute between the heirs of a deceased man, William Wilkins, and the executor of his estate, John Wells. The heirs argued that Wells had mismanaged the estate and had not properly accounted for the assets. The Supreme Court held that the executor had a duty to account for the assets of the estate and that the heirs had a right to demand an accounting. The Court also held that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1885
Docket: 657
116 U.S. 393
6 S. Ct. 601
29 L. Ed. 671
1886 U.S. LEXIS 1772

Wells & Others v. Wilkins

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Wells & Others v. Wilkins is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1886. The case involved a dispute between the heirs of a deceased man, William Wilkins, and the executor of his estate, John Wells. The heirs argued that Wells had mismanaged the estate and had not properly accounted for the assets. The Supreme Court held that the executor had a duty to account for the assets of the estate and that the heirs had a right to demand an accounting. The Court also held that the executor had a duty to act in good faith and with due diligence in managing the estate. The Court further held that the executor was liable for any losses resulting from his mismanagement of the estate. The Court also held that the heirs had a right to seek damages from the executor for any losses resulting from his mismanagement. The Court's decision established the principle that executors have a duty to properly manage and account for the assets of an estate.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Wells & Others v. Wilkins, a case concerning whether or not an African-American man was entitled to his freedom after being held as a slave for many years. Justice Field argued that the plaintiff's claim of freedom should have been heard by a jury and that it was wrong for the court to decide on such matters without allowing juries to weigh in on them. He further stated that since slavery had been abolished by Congress, any person claiming their right to be free should be given due process under law and allowed their day in court before having their claims decided upon. Additionally, he noted how there were no laws at the time which would prevent slaves from bringing suit against those who unlawfully kept them enslaved and thus they should have been afforded this opportunity if they chose to do so. In conclusion, Justice Field believed that denying these individuals access to justice through jury trials violated both natural justice and fundamental principles of liberty enshrined within American law at the time of this decision.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Jan 11, 1886
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms