Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Company

• 1907 • 207 U.S. 375 • Fuller Court
In the 1907 case of Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Company, the U.S. Supreme Court examined whether a copyright infringement claim could be made against an entity that imported and sold copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. The plaintiff, Richard Werckmeister, held copyrights for certain paintings which were reproduced in lithographs by a German company and then imported into America by the defendant, American Tobacco Company. The court ruled in favor of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1907
Docket: 29
207 U.S. 375
28 S. Ct. 124
52 L. Ed. 254
1907 U.S. LEXIS 1232
Argued: Oct 30, 1907

Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1907 case of Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Company, the U.S. Supreme Court examined whether a copyright infringement claim could be made against an entity that imported and sold copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. The plaintiff, Richard Werckmeister, held copyrights for certain paintings which were reproduced in lithographs by a German company and then imported into America by the defendant, American Tobacco Company. The court ruled in favor of Werckmeister stating that importing unauthorized copies was indeed an infringement under U.S Copyright law even if they were produced abroad where no such protection existed at that time. This ruling established important precedent regarding international copyright protections and affirmed that importation of unauthorized reproductions constitutes as direct infringement.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Company argued that the majority's decision to allow a copyright owner to seize and destroy infringing copies was too broad and could potentially lead to abuse. The dissent emphasized that while it is important for copyright owners to be able to protect their rights, this should not extend so far as allowing them complete control over all copies of their work, including those made without permission. This power, they argued, would give copyright owners an undue amount of control over the distribution of ideas and information which goes against public interest. Furthermore, they contended that such a ruling contradicts previous decisions by the court which held that copyrights are limited monopolies granted for specific purposes only.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Dec 16, 1907
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms