Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company

• 1899 • 178 U.S. 239 • Fuller Court
In the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company, 1899, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Western Union Telegraph Co., stating that a telegraph company has an obligation to deliver messages with reasonable speed and accuracy. The dispute arose when a message was sent via Western Union from New York to Michigan but was not delivered promptly due to negligence on part of the receiving operator at Ann Arbor Railroad Co. As a result, the sender suffered financial loss...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1899
Docket: 202
178 U.S. 239
20 S. Ct. 867
44 L. Ed. 1052
1900 U.S. LEXIS 1671
Argued: Mar 19, 1800

Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company, 1899, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Western Union Telegraph Co., stating that a telegraph company has an obligation to deliver messages with reasonable speed and accuracy. The dispute arose when a message was sent via Western Union from New York to Michigan but was not delivered promptly due to negligence on part of the receiving operator at Ann Arbor Railroad Co. As a result, the sender suffered financial loss as he could not act upon information contained in the telegram within time. The court held that telegraph companies are liable for damages if they fail to transmit or deliver messages correctly and without unreasonable delay unless there is an agreement limiting their liability.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company argued that the majority's decision to allow Western Union to install telegraph lines along the railroad right-of-way without obtaining consent from or compensating Ann Arbor Railroad was incorrect. The dissent contended that while federal law did grant telegraph companies certain rights, it did not absolve them of their obligation to respect private property rights and negotiate fair agreements with landowners. They believed this ruling could set a dangerous precedent by allowing corporations to exploit public resources for private gain without providing adequate compensation or consideration for those affected by their actions.

Opinion written by Justice MWFuller
Decided: May 21, 1800
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms