Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Western Union Telegraph Company v. Hughes

• 1906 • 203 U.S. 505 • Fuller Court
In the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Hughes in 1906, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a telegraph company could be held liable for damages if it negligently transmitted or delivered a message. The plaintiff, Hughes, had sent an urgent telegram via Western Union to his wife's doctor requesting immediate assistance due to her serious illness. However, due to negligence on part of the telegraph operator who failed to deliver the message promptly and accurately, medical help arrived...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1906
Docket: 119
203 U.S. 505
27 S. Ct. 162
51 L. Ed. 294
1906 U.S. LEXIS 1615
Argued: Dec 06, 1906

Western Union Telegraph Company v. Hughes

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Hughes in 1906, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a telegraph company could be held liable for damages if it negligently transmitted or delivered a message. The plaintiff, Hughes, had sent an urgent telegram via Western Union to his wife's doctor requesting immediate assistance due to her serious illness. However, due to negligence on part of the telegraph operator who failed to deliver the message promptly and accurately, medical help arrived too late and Mrs. Hughes passed away as a result. The court found Western Union guilty of negligence causing wrongful death and awarded Mr.Hughes $5,000 in damages (equivalent today is about $140k). This ruling established that companies providing communication services have an obligation towards their customers for timely and accurate transmission/delivery of messages.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Hughes argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and infringed upon state rights. The dissent contended that telegraph companies, like railroads, are public service corporations subject to regulation by states where they operate. They believed it was within a state's power to impose reasonable regulations on such entities for the protection of its citizens without violating federal law or constitutionally protected interstate commerce rights. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority’s interpretation of “discrimination,” arguing that differential pricing based on distance traveled does not constitute unjust discrimination if rates are reasonable and applied uniformly across similar distances.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Dec 17, 1906
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms