Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc.

• 1957 • 355 U.S. 563 • Warren Court
In the case of Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc., the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining who should bear responsibility for injuries sustained by a longshoreman while loading cargo onto a ship owned by Weyerhaeuser but operated and maintained by Nacirema. The court held that under Section 5(b) of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, an owner is not liable if they have fully transferred control over to another party, in this case - Nacirema...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1957
Docket: 75
355 U.S. 563
78 S. Ct. 438
2 L. Ed. 2d 491
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1770
Argued: Jan 06, 1958

Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc., the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining who should bear responsibility for injuries sustained by a longshoreman while loading cargo onto a ship owned by Weyerhaeuser but operated and maintained by Nacirema. The court held that under Section 5(b) of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, an owner is not liable if they have fully transferred control over to another party, in this case - Nacirema Operating Company. Therefore, it was determined that since Weyerhaeuser had no control or supervision over the loading operations at the time of injury, they were not responsible for ensuring safe conditions during those operations nor could they be held accountable for any negligence leading to accidents or injuries on board their vessel.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc., Justice Brennan disagreed with the majority's interpretation of a clause in a stevedoring contract, arguing that it did not indemnify shipowners against their own negligence. He contended that such an interpretation was inconsistent with general principles of contract law and maritime law, which typically require clear and unequivocal language to impose liability for one's own negligence on another party. Furthermore, he argued that this ruling could have negative implications by discouraging shipowners from maintaining safe conditions onboard their vessels since they would be shielded from liability under such contracts.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Mar 03, 1958
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms