Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Whalen, Commissioner Of Health Of New York v. Roe Et Al.

• 1976 • 429 U.S. 589 • Burger Court
In Whalen v. Roe, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a case involving privacy rights and state power to maintain records of controlled substance prescriptions. The New York State Controlled Substance Act of 1972 required doctors to provide the state with information about patients receiving certain types of drugs, which was then stored in a centralized database. A group of patients and physicians sued Richard D. Whalen, Commissioner of Health for New York State at that time, arguing this violated...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1976
Docket: 75-839
429 U.S. 589
97 S. Ct. 869
51 L. Ed. 2d 64
1977 U.S. LEXIS 42
Argued: Oct 13, 1976

Whalen, Commissioner Of Health Of New York v. Roe Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Whalen v. Roe, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a case involving privacy rights and state power to maintain records of controlled substance prescriptions. The New York State Controlled Substance Act of 1972 required doctors to provide the state with information about patients receiving certain types of drugs, which was then stored in a centralized database. A group of patients and physicians sued Richard D. Whalen, Commissioner of Health for New York State at that time, arguing this violated their constitutional right to privacy by disclosing personal medical information without consent. The court held that while individuals have a constitutionally protected interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters, it did not find any unconstitutional invasion into those interests by the act's requirements as there were sufficient security measures preventing public access or misuse. Furthermore, they noted that states have an interest in health matters including controlling drug abuse through record-keeping systems like these. However, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote separately emphasizing potential dangers if such databases are misused but concurred with majority since he found no evidence suggesting improper use or risk thereof under current procedures.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Whalen v. Roe, Justice Brennan argued that the New York State Controlled Substance Act of 1972 violated an individual's constitutional right to privacy. He believed that patients should have control over their personal information and medical records without interference from state authorities. The law required doctors to provide copies of prescriptions for certain drugs to a centralized computer system, which he saw as an unwarranted intrusion into private matters between doctor and patient. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential misuse or abuse of this sensitive data by government officials or other unauthorized individuals who might gain access to it inappropriately. In his view, such risks outweighed any benefits derived from monitoring prescription drug use more closely in order to prevent illegal distribution or misuse.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Feb 22, 1977
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms