Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander, Tax Commissioner Of Ohio

• 1948 • 337 U.S. 562 • Vinson Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander, Tax Commissioner of Ohio in 1948 revolved around the issue of discriminatory taxation by a state against out-of-state corporations and their property located within that state's borders. The Wheeling Steel Corporation, incorporated in Delaware but with properties in Ohio, argued that it was being unfairly taxed by the State of Ohio compared to similar businesses incorporated within the state itself - an alleged violation of both due...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1948
Docket: 447
337 U.S. 562
69 S. Ct. 1291
93 L. Ed. 2d 1544
1949 U.S. LEXIS 2150
Argued: Mar 29, 1949

Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander, Tax Commissioner Of Ohio

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander, Tax Commissioner of Ohio in 1948 revolved around the issue of discriminatory taxation by a state against out-of-state corporations and their property located within that state's borders. The Wheeling Steel Corporation, incorporated in Delaware but with properties in Ohio, argued that it was being unfairly taxed by the State of Ohio compared to similar businesses incorporated within the state itself - an alleged violation of both due process and equal protection clauses under the Fourteenth Amendment as well as interstate commerce clause under Article I Section 8 Clause 3 (the Commerce Clause) of the Constitution. The court ruled unanimously in favor of Wheeling Steel Corp., finding that such differential treatment indeed constituted discrimination against interstate commerce and violated constitutional principles regarding equality before law for all citizens regardless if they are residents or non-residents.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander, Justice Frankfurter argued that Ohio's tax law did not violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution as it was applied to an out-of-state corporation operating within its borders. He contended that a state has every right to impose taxes on businesses functioning within its jurisdiction, regardless of where their headquarters are located or where they were incorporated. The majority's ruling, he believed, undermined states' rights and could potentially lead to corporations exploiting loopholes in order to avoid paying their fair share of taxes by simply incorporating elsewhere while still conducting business in various states across the country.

Opinion written by Justice RHJackson
Decided: Jun 20, 1949
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms