Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

White, Secretary Of State Of Texas v. Weiser Et Al.

• 1972 • 412 U.S. 783 • Burger Court
In the case of White, Secretary of State of Texas v. Weiser et al., 1972, the Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a state's congressional districting plan that resulted in population variances among districts violated the Equal Protection Clause. The appellants argued that small deviations from absolute equality were justified by legitimate state interests such as maintaining political subdivisions and respecting natural geographic boundaries. However, the appellees contended that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1972
Docket: 71-1623
412 U.S. 783
93 S. Ct. 2348
37 L. Ed. 2d 335
1973 U.S. LEXIS 3
Argued: Feb 26, 1973

White, Secretary Of State Of Texas v. Weiser Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of White, Secretary of State of Texas v. Weiser et al., 1972, the Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a state's congressional districting plan that resulted in population variances among districts violated the Equal Protection Clause. The appellants argued that small deviations from absolute equality were justified by legitimate state interests such as maintaining political subdivisions and respecting natural geographic boundaries. However, the appellees contended that any deviation from perfect numerical equality was unconstitutional unless necessary to achieve a compelling governmental interest. The Supreme Court held in favor of Weiser and others, ruling that even minor disparities in population among districts could not be justified without sufficient cause. The court emphasized its previous rulings which stated "as nearly as is practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another’s." Therefore, it concluded that there must be good reasons for any departures from this principle. This decision reaffirmed earlier precedents establishing strict scrutiny for apportionment schemes deviating from equal representation and underscored states' obligations under federal law to ensure fair representation when redistricting.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for White, Secretary of State of Texas v. Weiser et al., Justice William O. Douglas argued that the majority's decision was a departure from previous rulings which required states to make good faith efforts to achieve population equality in congressional districts. He contended that even minor deviations from absolute numerical equality should be justified by compelling state interests, and he did not believe such justifications existed in this case. Furthermore, Douglas expressed concern about potential political manipulation resulting from allowing these deviations. He believed that permitting any deviation could lead to gerrymandering or other forms of political gamesmanship designed to favor one group over another.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jun 18, 1973
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms