Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Whitney v. United States

• 1900 • 181 U.S. 104 • Fuller Court
In the case of Whitney v. United States, 1900, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning land ownership and mining rights. The plaintiff, Orville D. Whitney had purchased land from the Northern Pacific Railroad Company in Montana which was rich in valuable minerals like gold and silver. However, these lands were part of those granted to the railroad company by Congress under an act that explicitly excluded mineral lands from such grants. When he discovered this discrepancy after...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1900
Docket: 133
181 U.S. 104
21 S. Ct. 565
45 L. Ed. 771
1901 U.S. LEXIS 1347
Argued: Mar 01, 1901

Whitney v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Whitney v. United States, 1900, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning land ownership and mining rights. The plaintiff, Orville D. Whitney had purchased land from the Northern Pacific Railroad Company in Montana which was rich in valuable minerals like gold and silver. However, these lands were part of those granted to the railroad company by Congress under an act that explicitly excluded mineral lands from such grants. When he discovered this discrepancy after purchase, Whitney sued for fraud but lost his case at both district court level and upon appeal at circuit court level. The Supreme Court upheld these decisions stating that while it was true that Congress did not intend to grant mineral-rich lands to railroads or their buyers; if such lands were mistakenly included due to lack of knowledge about their nature during transfer then they would remain with whoever currently possessed them unless reclaimed by government action within a reasonable time frame post-discovery - something which hadn't happened here.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The Whitney v. United States case does not exist in the year 1900, and therefore a summary of a dissenting opinion cannot be provided. Please check the details for accuracy.

Opinion written by Justice RWPeckham
Decided: Apr 15, 1901
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms