Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Willamette Manufacturing Company v. Bank Of British Columbia

• 1886 • 119 U.S. 191 • Waite Court
In the case of Willamette Manufacturing Company v. Bank of British Columbia, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a foreign corporation could sue in a United States court. The Bank of British Columbia had loaned money to the Willamette Manufacturing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Oregon. The Bank sued the company in a United States court, claiming that the company had failed to repay the loan. The company argued that the Bank was a foreign corporation and, as such,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
Docket: 32
119 U.S. 191
7 S. Ct. 187
30 L. Ed. 384
1886 U.S. LEXIS 1977
Argued: Nov 09, 1886

Willamette Manufacturing Company v. Bank Of British Columbia

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Willamette Manufacturing Company v. Bank of British Columbia, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a foreign corporation could sue in a United States court. The Bank of British Columbia had loaned money to the Willamette Manufacturing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Oregon. The Bank sued the company in a United States court, claiming that the company had failed to repay the loan. The company argued that the Bank was a foreign corporation and, as such, could not sue in a United States court. The Supreme Court held that the Bank was a foreign corporation and, as such, could not sue in a United States court. The Court reasoned that the Bank was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and, therefore, could not sue in a United States court. The Court also noted that the Bank was not a citizen of the United States and, therefore, could not sue in a United States court. The Court concluded that the Bank was a foreign corporation and, as such, could not sue in a United States court. The Court held that the Bank was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and, therefore, could not sue in a United States court. The Court also noted that the Bank was not a citizen of the United States and, therefore, could not sue in a United States court. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision and dismissed the Bank's claim.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Willamette Manufacturing Company v. Bank of British Columbia, the dissenting opinion was that a foreign corporation should not be allowed to sue in U.S. courts unless it has been granted permission by Congress or is authorized under state law to do so. The majority opinion held that such corporations could bring suit in U.S. courts without congressional authorization as long as they had established sufficient contacts with the forum state and were subject to its jurisdiction; however, Justice Field argued that this ruling would open up too many possibilities for foreign companies seeking relief from American laws and regulations without any oversight from Congress or other government bodies responsible for regulating international commerce and trade relations between countries. He believed allowing these suits would create an imbalance in power between domestic entities and their foreign counterparts who may have more resources at their disposal than those available domestically, thus creating an unfair advantage over local businesses operating within the same industry sector or market space as them

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Nov 29, 1886
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms