Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Willard v. Presbury

• 1869 • 81 U.S. 676 • Chase Court
Willard v. Presbury was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a contract was valid when it was made without consideration. The case involved two parties, Willard and Presbury, who had entered into a contract in which Willard agreed to pay Presbury a certain sum of money in exchange for a piece of land. Presbury had already owned the land prior to the contract, and thus there was no consideration given by him in exchange for the money. The Supreme Court held...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1869
81 U.S. 676
20 L. Ed. 719
1871 U.S. LEXIS 1032
Argued: Feb 25, 1870

Willard v. Presbury

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Willard v. Presbury was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a contract was valid when it was made without consideration. The case involved two parties, Willard and Presbury, who had entered into a contract in which Willard agreed to pay Presbury a certain sum of money in exchange for a piece of land. Presbury had already owned the land prior to the contract, and thus there was no consideration given by him in exchange for the money. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid, despite the lack of consideration. The Court reasoned that the contract was made in good faith and that the parties had intended to be bound by it. The Court also noted that the contract was not made with the intention of defrauding either party, and that the parties had acted in a reasonable manner. The Court's decision in Willard v. Presbury established that a contract can be valid even if it is made without consideration. This decision has been cited in numerous subsequent cases, and it has become an important precedent in contract law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Willard v. Presbury, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when one of the parties had been induced to enter into it by fraudulent representations made by the other party. The majority opinion held that since fraud had been committed, the contract should not be enforced and damages should be awarded to compensate for any losses incurred as a result of entering into it. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling on several grounds. He argued that although fraud may have occurred in inducing one party to enter into an agreement, if both sides were aware of its terms and conditions at the time they entered into it then there is no reason why those terms cannot still remain binding even though some form of deception or misrepresentation was used in obtaining them. Furthermore, he noted that enforcing such contracts would help ensure fairness among all involved while also providing greater certainty regarding contractual obligations which are essential for economic stability and growth within society as a whole.

Opinion written by Justice SNelson
Decided: Mar 07, 1870
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms