Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Williamson v. Moore

1867 • 154 U.S. 557 • Chase Court
Williamson v. Moore was a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1867. The case involved a dispute between two parties over the ownership of a slave. The plaintiff, Williamson, claimed that he had purchased the slave from Moore, the defendant, and that Moore had failed to deliver the slave to him. Moore argued that the slave had been sold to another party before the sale to Williamson had been completed. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Williamson, finding that Moore had...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1867
Docket: 421
154 U.S. 557
14 S. Ct. 1216
38 L. Ed. 1088
1868 U.S. LEXIS 1075
Argued: Feb 14, 1868

Williamson v. Moore

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Williamson v. Moore was a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1867. The case involved a dispute between two parties over the ownership of a slave. The plaintiff, Williamson, claimed that he had purchased the slave from Moore, the defendant, and that Moore had failed to deliver the slave to him. Moore argued that the slave had been sold to another party before the sale to Williamson had been completed. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Williamson, finding that Moore had breached his contract with Williamson by failing to deliver the slave. The Court held that Moore was liable for damages for his breach of contract, and that Williamson was entitled to the value of the slave. The Court also held that Moore was liable for any costs incurred by Williamson in attempting to recover the slave. The decision in Williamson v. Moore established that a contract for the sale of a slave was legally binding and enforceable in the United States. The case also established that a party who breaches a contract for the sale of a slave is liable for damages and any costs incurred by the other party in attempting to recover the slave.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Williamson v. Moore, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a state court had jurisdiction over a dispute between two citizens of different states. The majority opinion held that it did not, as such disputes were governed by federal law and could only be decided in federal courts. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on the basis that there was no clear indication in either statute or precedent that Congress intended for all interstate disputes to be heard exclusively in federal courts. He argued further that if Congress wanted exclusive jurisdiction over these matters they would have explicitly stated so rather than leaving it up to interpretation by judges who may disagree with one another's interpretations of congressional intent. In conclusion, he believed that allowing state courts to hear cases involving citizens from different states would help ensure justice is served without infringing upon any constitutional rights or powers granted solely to the federal government.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms