Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wilmette Park District v. Campbell, Collector Of Internal Revenue

• 1949 • 338 U.S. 411 • Vinson Court
In the Wilmette Park District v. Campbell case of 1949, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Wilmette Park District. The issue at hand was whether or not a park district could be considered a political subdivision of a state and therefore exempt from federal income tax under Section 101(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. The court held that since Illinois law granted park districts substantial governmental powers including eminent domain, taxation, and police power; they were indeed political...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1949
Docket: 75
338 U.S. 411
70 S. Ct. 195
94 L. Ed. 2d 205
1949 U.S. LEXIS 3065
Argued: Nov 15, 1949

Wilmette Park District v. Campbell, Collector Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Wilmette Park District v. Campbell case of 1949, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Wilmette Park District. The issue at hand was whether or not a park district could be considered a political subdivision of a state and therefore exempt from federal income tax under Section 101(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. The court held that since Illinois law granted park districts substantial governmental powers including eminent domain, taxation, and police power; they were indeed political subdivisions and thus entitled to exemption from federal income tax. This decision clarified an important aspect regarding what entities qualify as "political subdivisions" for purposes of federal taxation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Wilmette Park District v. Campbell, Collector of Internal Revenue argued that the majority's decision to exempt a municipal corporation from federal taxation was incorrect. The dissenters believed that Congress did not intend for such entities to be tax-exempt under Section 811(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code because they are not "corporations organized for exclusively charitable purposes." They pointed out that while these organizations may provide services beneficial to their communities, this does not necessarily make them charitable institutions as defined by law. Furthermore, they contended that granting such an exemption could lead to significant revenue loss and potential abuse if other similar entities sought tax-exempt status based on this precedent.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Dec 12, 1949
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms