Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton

• 1906 • 205 U.S. 60 • Fuller Court
In the 1906 case of Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Fulton, upholding a lower court's decision that he was entitled to compensation for an injury sustained while working at Wilmington Star Mining Company. The company had argued that it should not be held liable because Fulton was aware of the risks associated with his job and chose to continue working anyway. However, the court found that this argument did not absolve employers from their...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1906
Docket: 139
205 U.S. 60
27 S. Ct. 412
51 L. Ed. 708
1907 U.S. LEXIS 1452
Argued: Jan 07, 1907

Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1906 case of Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Fulton, upholding a lower court's decision that he was entitled to compensation for an injury sustained while working at Wilmington Star Mining Company. The company had argued that it should not be held liable because Fulton was aware of the risks associated with his job and chose to continue working anyway. However, the court found that this argument did not absolve employers from their responsibility to provide safe work environments for their employees. It stated that even if workers are aware of potential dangers, they often have no choice but to accept these conditions due to economic necessity. Therefore, companies cannot evade liability by claiming workers assumed risk voluntarily.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Wilmington Star Mining Company v. Fulton argued that the plaintiff, Mr. Fulton, was not entitled to damages because he willingly assumed the risks associated with his job as a miner. The justice opined that it was common knowledge among miners and mining companies alike that gas explosions were an inherent risk of coal mining operations. Therefore, by accepting employment in such conditions, Mr. Fulton had implicitly agreed to bear these risks himself and could not hold his employer liable for any injuries sustained as a result thereof.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Mar 04, 1907
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms