Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involved the Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., which was accused by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) of refusing to bargain in good faith with a union. The central issue revolved around whether certain proposals made by the company during collective bargaining negotiations constituted mandatory subjects of bargaining under Section 8(d) of the National Labor Relations Act. Specifically, these proposals included clauses about management rights and no-strike provisions that were deemed permissive rather than mandatory subjects for negotiation. The Supreme Court upheld NLRB's decision, affirming that employers must negotiate over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment but are not required to agree on non-mandatory topics unless both parties consent. This ruling reinforced the distinction between mandatory and permissive subjects in labor negotiations.

Opinion written by Justice Burton

Decided 5 May 1958 · Official report

usrep356342.pdfOpen in a new tab