Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Wyandotte County Gas Company v. State Of Kansas, On Relation Of Marshall, Attorney For The Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of Kansas

• 1913 • 231 U.S. 622 • White Court
The Wyandotte County Gas Company v. State of Kansas case in 1913 revolved around the issue of whether a state could regulate gas prices for private companies. The Public Utilities Commission of Kansas had set rates that the Wyandotte County Gas Company was required to charge its customers, which the company argued was an infringement on their rights as a private corporation and amounted to property confiscation without due process. However, the U.S Supreme Court ruled against them, upholding...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1913
Docket: 472
231 U.S. 622
34 S. Ct. 226
58 L. Ed. 404
1914 U.S. LEXIS 1433
Argued: Dec 02, 1913

Wyandotte County Gas Company v. State Of Kansas, On Relation Of Marshall, Attorney For The Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of Kansas

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Wyandotte County Gas Company v. State of Kansas case in 1913 revolved around the issue of whether a state could regulate gas prices for private companies. The Public Utilities Commission of Kansas had set rates that the Wyandotte County Gas Company was required to charge its customers, which the company argued was an infringement on their rights as a private corporation and amounted to property confiscation without due process. However, the U.S Supreme Court ruled against them, upholding that states have inherent power to regulate utilities serving public needs within their jurisdiction under police powers granted by the Constitution. This decision reinforced states' authority over local utility pricing and regulation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Wyandotte County Gas Company v. State of Kansas argued that the state had overstepped its bounds by interfering with a private contract between a gas company and its customers. The justice believed that while states have the power to regulate public utilities, they should not be able to dictate terms of contracts or set prices arbitrarily without due process. They contended that this was an infringement on property rights protected under the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits any state from depriving "any person of life, liberty, or property without due process." This decision could potentially discourage businesses from operating within such regulatory constraints and ultimately harm consumers by limiting competition and choice in utility providers.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Jan 05, 1914
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms