Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Yazoo And Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. Jackson Vinegar Co.

• 1912 • 226 U.S. 217 • White Court
In the case of Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. Jackson Vinegar Co., 1912, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by its failure to deliver goods in a timely manner. The Jackson Vinegar Company had contracted with the Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Company for transportation of vinegar from Memphis, Tennessee to Vicksburg, Mississippi within five days. However, due to negligence on part of the railroad...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1912
Docket: 57
226 U.S. 217
33 S. Ct. 40
57 L. Ed. 193
1912 U.S. LEXIS 2147

Yazoo And Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. Jackson Vinegar Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. Jackson Vinegar Co., 1912, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by its failure to deliver goods in a timely manner. The Jackson Vinegar Company had contracted with the Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Company for transportation of vinegar from Memphis, Tennessee to Vicksburg, Mississippi within five days. However, due to negligence on part of the railroad company's employees, delivery was delayed causing damage to vinegar barrels which resulted in loss for Jackson Vinegar Co.. The court ruled that under common law principles governing bailments (temporary possession or control over personal property), when goods are delivered into custody of carrier it is their duty not only safely carry but also promptly deliver them at destination; any delay beyond reasonable time constitutes breach entitling owner recover damages resulting therefrom unless such delay can be justified by circumstances beyond control or prevention.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Co. v. Jackson Vinegar Co., it was argued that the majority's decision to hold the railroad company liable for damages caused by a delay in shipment was unjustified. The dissenting justices believed that there were no grounds to assume negligence on part of the railroad company, as they had not violated any explicit contractual obligations or demonstrated clear misconduct in their handling of goods. They contended that delays can occur due to various unforeseen circumstances beyond control, which should be considered while determining liability. Therefore, they disagreed with imposing an absolute duty on carriers to deliver goods within a specific time frame without considering potential justifiable reasons for delay.

Opinion written by Justice WVanDevanter
Decided: Dec 02, 1912
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms