Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Joseph H. Adler, Lewis Schiff, Solomon Adler, And Lobe Rindskoff, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Aaron D. Fenton, Oliver H. Lee, William H. Davis, And Merrit T. Cole

1860 • 65 U.S. 407 • Taney Court
Joseph H. Adler, Lewis Schiff, Solomon Adler and Lobe Rindskoff were the plaintiffs in error in this Supreme Court case against Aaron D. Fenton, Oliver H. Lee, William H. Davis and Merrit T. Cole as defendants in error. The dispute arose from a contract between the parties for the sale of certain real estate located near San Francisco Bay that was owned by Joseph and Solomon Adler at the time of their agreement with Fenton et al., who had agreed to purchase it for $20,000 payable over three...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1860
65 U.S. 407
16 L. Ed. 696
1860 U.S. LEXIS 418
Argued: Feb 05, 1861

Joseph H. Adler, Lewis Schiff, Solomon Adler, And Lobe Rindskoff, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Aaron D. Fenton, Oliver H. Lee, William H. Davis, And Merrit T. Cole

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Joseph H. Adler, Lewis Schiff, Solomon Adler and Lobe Rindskoff were the plaintiffs in error in this Supreme Court case against Aaron D. Fenton, Oliver H. Lee, William H. Davis and Merrit T. Cole as defendants in error. The dispute arose from a contract between the parties for the sale of certain real estate located near San Francisco Bay that was owned by Joseph and Solomon Adler at the time of their agreement with Fenton et al., who had agreed to purchase it for $20,000 payable over three years with interest on deferred payments at 10%. When payment became due on January 1st 1859 according to terms of the contract but was not made by Fenton et al., Joseph and Solomon sued them for breach of contract seeking specific performance or damages if they failed to comply with its terms; however when judgment went against them they appealed claiming that there were errors committed during trial proceedings which rendered an unjust verdict against them resulting in their loss of property rights without just compensation being paid out as required under law.. The Supreme Court ultimately found no reversible errors present during trial proceedings thus upholding lower court's decision denying relief sought by plaintiffs while affirming defendant’s right to possession based upon valid title obtained through execution of original sales agreement between all parties involved

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of this case, Justice Grier argued that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to prove their claim. He noted that although they alleged a breach of contract between themselves and the defendants, no written agreement was presented as proof. Furthermore, he stated that even if an oral agreement did exist between them, it would be impossible for a court to determine its terms without any witnesses or other corroborating evidence. In conclusion, Justice Grier concluded that there was insufficient proof to support the plaintiff's claims and thus ruled in favor of the defendants.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms