Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, et al. v. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc. et al.

Questions presented

SCOTUS records

01-653 FCC v. NEXTWAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS INC. Ruling below: CA DC, 254 F.3d 130. QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 525, conflicts with and displaces the Federal Communications Commission's rules for congressionally authorized spectrum auctions, which provide that wireless telecommunications licenses obtained at auction automatically cancel upon the winning bidder's failure to make timely payments to fulfill its winning bid. 01-657 ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORP. v. NEXTWAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS INC. Ruling below: CA DC, 254 F.3d 130. QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 525, prohibits the Federal Communications Commission from canceling a radio spectrum license where the agency has determined, in an exercise of its regulatory authority, that such cancellation is necessary to ensure that licenses are granted to those most likely to use them efficiently for the benefit of the public. CERT. GRANTED: 3/4/02 Consolidated for one hour oral argument.

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involved a dispute over the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) authority to revoke licenses from NextWave Personal Communications Inc. after it failed to make timely payments for spectrum licenses acquired in an FCC auction. NextWave filed for bankruptcy, and during this process, argued that the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code prevented the FCC from canceling its licenses due to non-payment. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of NextWave, holding that federal law prohibits governmental entities like the FCC from revoking such licenses solely because of failure to pay debts discharged under bankruptcy proceedings. This decision emphasized that regulatory actions cannot contravene specific protections afforded by bankruptcy laws, thereby reinforcing debtor rights against administrative agencies' punitive measures when financial obligations are unmet due to insolvency.

Opinion written by Justice Scalia

Decided 27 Jan 2003 · Official report

usrep537293.pdfOpen in a new tab