Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Butler v. United States

• 1874 • 88 U.S. 272 • Waite Court
In Butler v. United States, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. The Act was passed by Congress in order to provide economic relief to farmers during the Great Depression. The Act imposed a tax on processors of certain agricultural products, and the proceeds of the tax were used to pay subsidies to farmers who agreed to reduce their production. The Court held that the Act was constitutional. The Court reasoned that Congress had the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1874
Docket: 192
88 U.S. 272
22 L. Ed. 614
1874 U.S. LEXIS 1365

Butler v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Butler v. United States, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. The Act was passed by Congress in order to provide economic relief to farmers during the Great Depression. The Act imposed a tax on processors of certain agricultural products, and the proceeds of the tax were used to pay subsidies to farmers who agreed to reduce their production. The Court held that the Act was constitutional. The Court reasoned that Congress had the power to tax and spend for the general welfare of the nation, and that the Act was a valid exercise of that power. The Court also held that the Act did not violate the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, as the subsidies were voluntary and the tax was imposed on processors, not farmers. The Court's decision in Butler v. United States established the principle that Congress has broad authority to tax and spend for the general welfare of the nation. This principle has been cited in numerous subsequent Supreme Court decisions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Butler v. United States, arguing that Congress had exceeded its authority under the Constitution when it passed a law taxing income from certain kinds of property. He argued that this was an unconstitutional exercise of power because it violated the Tenth Amendment, which reserves to states all powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution. Furthermore, he argued that taxation is a state prerogative and should remain so; if Congress were allowed to tax incomes from property then they would be able to control how much money people have available for investment and other economic activities. This could lead to an imbalance between states with high taxes and those with low taxes, resulting in unfair competition among them. Finally, Justice Field noted that such taxation would also interfere with contracts made between individuals or corporations since any profits derived from these agreements could be subject to taxation by both state and federal governments at different rates depending on where they are located.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Feb 22, 1875
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms