Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved a challenge to the Social Security Act's provisions regarding benefits for children born out of wedlock. The plaintiffs argued that these provisions discriminated against illegitimate children, violating their right to equal protection under the law as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court held that Congress had broad discretion in creating classifications within social welfare programs and found that there was a rational basis for distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate children in this context. Specifically, it noted that such distinctions were intended to promote family stability and ensure adequate support from parents who could be identified more reliably when paternity was established through marriage.
Opinion of the Court
Decided 27 Feb 1978 · Official report