Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Carter Et Al. v. Jury Commission Of Greene County Et Al.

• 1969 • 396 U.S. 320 • Burger Court
In Carter et al. v. Jury Commission of Greene County et al., the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a case concerning racial discrimination in jury selection. The plaintiffs, African American residents of Greene County, Alabama, alleged that they were systematically excluded from serving on grand and petit juries by the county's jury commission due to their race. They argued this was a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights which guarantee equal protection under law regardless of race or...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1969
Docket: 30
396 U.S. 320
90 S. Ct. 518
24 L. Ed. 2d 549
1970 U.S. LEXIS 3148
Argued: Oct 21, 1969

Carter Et Al. v. Jury Commission Of Greene County Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Carter et al. v. Jury Commission of Greene County et al., the U.S Supreme Court dealt with a case concerning racial discrimination in jury selection. The plaintiffs, African American residents of Greene County, Alabama, alleged that they were systematically excluded from serving on grand and petit juries by the county's jury commission due to their race. They argued this was a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights which guarantee equal protection under law regardless of race or color. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs stating that systematic exclusion based on race is unconstitutional as it violates both Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause under Fourteenth Amendment. However, it also held that mere disparity between proportionate representation and actual representation does not alone establish discriminatory intent; rather there must be evidence showing purposeful discrimination. This landmark ruling reinforced the principle against racial bias in legal proceedings ensuring fair trial for all citizens irrespective of their ethnicity or background.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Carter et al. v. Jury Commission of Greene County et al., Justice Harlan argued that the majority's decision to invalidate Alabama's jury-selection system was based on an erroneous interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause in relation to racial discrimination. He contended that there was no evidence presented showing intentional exclusion or systematic underrepresentation of African Americans from juries, which would be necessary to establish a violation of equal protection rights. Instead, he believed that any disparities were due to neutral factors such as literacy tests and voluntary exclusions rather than deliberate discriminatory practices by officials involved in jury selection processes. Therefore, according to Justice Harlan, without clear proof demonstrating purposeful racial bias in selecting jurors, it is inappropriate for courts to intervene and overturn state laws governing these procedures.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Jan 19, 1970
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms