Coinbase v. Suski

Questions presented

SCOTUS records, cert granted 3 Nov 2023

Where parties enter into an arbitration agreement with a delegation clause, should an arbitrator or a court decide whether that arbitration agreement is narrowed by a later contract that is silent as to arbitration and delegation?

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The Supreme Court case involved a dispute between Coinbase, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and Suski, regarding the enforcement of arbitration agreements. The central issue was whether users who participated in promotional sweepstakes on Coinbase's platform were bound by an arbitration clause included in the terms of service. The court examined if these terms were adequately communicated to participants and if they consented to arbitrate disputes arising from their participation. Ultimately, the decision favored enforcing the arbitration agreement based on established principles that support upholding such clauses when clearly presented and agreed upon by parties entering into contractual relationships online.

Opinion written by Justice Jackson

Decided 23 May 2024 · Official report

602us1r26_k537.pdfOpen in a new tab

Oral argument transcript

Argued 28 Feb 2024

23-3_g21a.pdfOpen in a new tab