Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Covington Drawbridge Company, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Alexander O. Shepherd, Elijah F. Gillan, James Davidson, Samuel Mcclure Samuel Peters, And George Willard

1857 • 61 U.S. 227 • Taney Court
The Covington Drawbridge Company brought a case against Alexander O. Shepherd, Elijah F. Gillan, James Davidson, Samuel McClure Samuel Peters and George Willard in the Supreme Court of the United States. The company argued that they had been wrongfully charged for damages to their bridge by the defendants who were responsible for constructing a road over it without permission from Congress or any other authority. They claimed that this was an illegal act as only Congress has power to authorize...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1857
61 U.S. 227
15 L. Ed. 896
1857 U.S. LEXIS 453
Argued: Jan 21, 1858

The Covington Drawbridge Company, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Alexander O. Shepherd, Elijah F. Gillan, James Davidson, Samuel Mcclure Samuel Peters, And George Willard

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Covington Drawbridge Company brought a case against Alexander O. Shepherd, Elijah F. Gillan, James Davidson, Samuel McClure Samuel Peters and George Willard in the Supreme Court of the United States. The company argued that they had been wrongfully charged for damages to their bridge by the defendants who were responsible for constructing a road over it without permission from Congress or any other authority. They claimed that this was an illegal act as only Congress has power to authorize such construction projects on navigable waters and thus sought compensation for their losses due to the damage caused by said project. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Covington Drawbridge Company stating that no one can construct anything on navigable waters without authorization from Congress first and thus ordered all five defendants pay restitution for damages done to plaintiff's property as well as legal fees incurred during trial proceedings.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In this case, the Covington Drawbridge Company (plaintiffs) argued that Alexander O. Shepherd and his associates (defendants) had wrongfully taken possession of a bridge they owned over the Potomac River in Washington D.C., without their permission or consent. The Supreme Court found for the defendants, ruling that Congress had authorized them to construct a new bridge at the same location as part of an act to improve public highways in Washington D.C.. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Curtis argued that while Congress did have authority to pass laws concerning roads within its jurisdiction, it could not authorize individuals such as Shepherd and his associates to take private property without just compensation from those who already held title rights over it - which was what happened here with respect to Covington's bridge across the Potomac River. He concluded by saying that if Congress wanted these individuals to build a new bridge on this site then they should be required firstly pay fair market value for any existing structures there before proceeding with construction work on their own project

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms